Why so many shades of grey! by Tara Hunt

At some point, someone decided that grey floors are the “classic” hue for wood flooring and now they dominate the market, especially when it comes to finding options for Luxury Vinyl Plank. I’m not a fan.

Sure, grey is “neutral” and easy to maintain (I once had dark hardwood and it was incredibly frustrating!), but why not go for a nice, natural wood tone? THAT’s classic and it will stand out against all of the generic showrooms we see today.

What looks more like home to you? This:

Valencia Hardwood Flooring from Craft Floor - a Sustainable Hardwood Flooring company

Or this:

Of course, many people really like the “clean, white, stark” look of the second design, but I find it so generic and common. In fact, while looking for an image to use as an example, I found myself not able to discern between various showrooms.

Grey is a perfectly fine colour and I, personally, have a lovely grey sectional, but it isn’t the piece that sets a monotone in my living room (plus, we chose the colour mostly due to having dogs and cats that we let on the furniture):

I also love the old, natural wood floors in my midcentury modern house. They bring such a lovely warmth to the space. Grey would make this space look cold, like this:

The natural wood is so much more appealing.

If I take the very grey showroom from above and add some colour to the floors, there is also a vast improvement in warming the space up, no?

Of course, now everything looks like it needs some colour around the floor, but you get my drift.

Grey floors are “neutral” in that they fade into the background of a scene, but they look out of place when you try to add colour and variety to a space, whereas, a natural wood (or wood-look) floor will be an equally “neutral” backdrop that adds warmth to any design.

Design isn’t meant to be as invisible as a blank canvas. It’s meant to be the painting on that canvas. Grey floors can work in some cases beautifully (industrial, hyper-modern, and even some rustic looks), but it isn’t a great neutral for ALL designs.

I’m mostly frustrated because we’re re-doing our basement and using Luxury Vinyl plank (we are redoing the basement due to a flood that ruined the floors). In a basement, where there is less natural light, a lighter, yellow-toned hardwood is ideal to brighten up the space. A grey tone will make it look drab and cold. There are endless shades of grey available, but very limited shades of yellow or orange-toned wood (and, where they exist, they are almost always double the price).

I’m very much looking forward to the trend of grey floors ending and a better selection of multiple wood tones coming back.

When it comes to building code, language is key by Tara Hunt

In my Codes and Regulations class, the professor asked the class something similar to:

“If a client wanted to maximize floor space by installing an external fire escape on their existing building as the second means of egress for the second floor of their building, what does the OBC say?”

Example of a Fire Escape in an existing building, an oft-seen occurrence in New York City, but not so often seen in Toronto.

Under Section 3.4. Exits, article 3.4.1.4. Types of Exit, the code states:

(1) Subject to the requirements of this Section, an exit from any floor area shall be one of the following, used singly or in combination:

(a) an exterior doorway,

(b) an exterior passageway,

(c) an exterior ramp,

(d) an exterior stairway,

(e) a fire escape (conforming to Subsection 3.4.7.),

(f) a horizontal exit,

(g) an interior passageway,

(h) an interior ramp, or

(i) an interior stairway.

And under Subsection 3.4.7. Fire Escapes, Article 3.4.7.1. Scope, states:

(1) Except as permitted by Sentence (2), fire escapes shall not be erected on a building.

(2) If it is impracticable to provide one or more of the exit facilities listed in Article 3.4.1.4., fire escapes conforming to Articles 3.4.7.2. to 3.4.7.7. are permitted to serve floor areas in an existing building provided the floor areas served are,

(a) not in an elementary or secondary school or a retirement home,

(b) not more than 2 storeys above ground level in care, care and treatment or detention occupancies, and

(c) not more than 5 storeys above ground level in other occupancies.

Most of the class (including myself at first!) read the 2nd point in this article as:

If it is impractical to provide one or more of the exit facilities listed in Article 3.4.1.4.

However, the word used in this subsection is impracticable, NOT impractical. Impractical would be fairly subjective. The client “would like to” maximize floor space. It would be expensive and/or unfortunate to install internal stairs. This would not maximize floor space. It’s impractical! But…what it is NOT is impracticable, which is a fancy word for IMPOSSIBLE.

So, the right answer is that, though the client cannot install the lower cost and more convenient fire escape, perhaps an exterior stairway that meets all of the requirements under Subsection 3.4.6. Types of Exit Facilities (which I won’t go into here, but requires much more space to build) is an option. If not, suggesting a way to cleverly maximize the remaining space would be in order!

This type of exterior stairs: enclosed, built with concrete and steel, using proper lighting, separated by fire walls, with exit signage and code-compliant hand rails is more in line with what would work for Ontario Building Code.

Language matters.

Personally, I’m unsure why the word “Impracticable” is used here as opposed to impossible, unfeasible, unworkable, etc as it can be easily misread. I’m not sure I’ve ever heard anyone use the word in a sentence. It’s ironic that the legalese that is often used to ensure clarity is what makes it difficult to understand a regulation. If put into plain words, it would be much more clear.